Word 到靜態站點生成器：轉換 Jekyll、Hugo 和 Astro 的文件 |WordToMD

Jekyll、Hugo、Astro 和 Eleventy 等靜態站點生成器 (SSG) 使用 Markdown 檔案來構建網站。如果您的內容團隊使用 Word 編寫內容，則將該內容轉換為 Markdown 是關鍵的第一步。本指南涵蓋了完整的 Word到靜態站點 工作流程。

核心工作流程

Word (.docx) → Markdown (.md) → SSG build → HTML website

每個箭頭都是一個變換：

WordToMD 轉換 .docx → .md
您的 SSG 構建系統讀取 .md 並生成 HTML
CDN 或託管平臺提供 HTML 服務

新增 Frontmatter

靜態站點生成器需要 YAML 前言 。轉換後 WordToMD，在內容之前新增一個 frontmatter 塊：

傑基爾/十一

---
layout: post
title: "Your Document Title"
date: 2026-05-25
categories: [tutorial, documentation]
tags: [word, markdown]
permalink: /blog/your-document/
---

雨果

---
title: "Your Document Title"
date: 2026-05-25
draft: false
tags: ["tutorial", "documentation"]
slug: "your-document"
---

阿斯特羅每個 Markdown 檔案頂部的

---
title: "Your Document Title"
date: 2026-05-25
description: "A brief description for SEO."
tags: ["tutorial", "documentation"]
draft: false
---

檔案組織

SSG 期望特定目錄中的內容檔案：

SSG	部落格文章目錄
傑基爾	`_posts/` （檔名： `YYYY-MM-DD-slug.md`)
雨果	`content/posts/`
阿斯特羅每個 Markdown 檔案頂部的	`src/content/blog/`
十一	您配置的任何目錄
Next.js	`content/` or `posts/` （取決於設定）

匹配您的 SSG 的檔名約定。Jekyll是最嚴格的： 2026-05-25-word-to-static-site.md.

標題和內容結構

SSG 顯示 # Heading 1 作為頁面的主標題。自從 title frontmatter 欄位已經定義了頁面標題，使用 H2 (##) 作為您的頂級內容標題，並避免在正文中使用 H1。

轉換之前，請檢查您的 Word 文件是否僅使用標題 1 作為文件標題，並使用標題 2 作為主要部分。看 Markdown 標題指南。

靜態站點中的影像

Word 文件中的影像需要：

從 Word 匯出（另存為→網頁將影像複製到資料夾）
放置在您的 SSG 的靜態資產目錄中（例如， public/images/ 對於 Astro/Next.js， assets/images/ ）
Markdown 中引用：

![Diagram description](/images/diagram.png)

表格

字表通過以下方式轉換為 GFM 語法 WordToMD. All major SSGs render GFM tables. See Markdown 表：完整指南.

程式碼塊

對於技術文件，請使用帶有語言識別符號的隔離程式碼塊進行語法突出顯示：

```python
def convert_document(filepath):
    with open(filepath, 'rb') as f:
        return mammoth.convert_to_markdown(f).value


See [Markdown Code Blocks Guide](/blog/markdown-code-blocks-guide) for all supported languages.

## Validating Markdown Before Build

Before running your SSG build, validate your converted Markdown:

- **markdownlint** — Checks for style consistency and errors
- **Vale** — Prose linting for technical writing
- **Your SSG's dev server** — The fastest way; run `hugo serve`, `jekyll serve`, or `astro dev` and check the rendered output

## Batch Conversion for Large Content Migrations

If you're migrating an existing Word-based content library to an SSG:

1. Use [WordToMD](/#converter) for individual files
2. For dozens of files, see [Batch Convert Word to Markdown](/blog/batch-convert-word-to-markdown) for command-line tools
3. Write a script to add frontmatter and rename files to your SSG's convention

A Python or Node.js script can automate the frontmatter injection after batch conversion.

## SSG-Specific Tips

### Jekyll
- Filename must include the date: `2026-05-25-your-slug.md`
- Use `categories:` for site navigation
- Liquid template tags conflict with certain curly-brace content in Markdown — escape with `{% raw %}...{% endraw %}`

### Hugo
- Hugo has strict frontmatter validation — required fields depend on your theme
- Use `hugo new content/posts/slug.md` to create a properly templated file, then paste converted content

### Astro
- Uses Content Collections with schema validation
- Ensure frontmatter fields match the schema in `src/content/config.ts`
- Astro's MDX support allows components inside Markdown if needed

### Eleventy
- Most flexible SSG — any .md file in any directory is content
- Frontmatter format is configurable (YAML, TOML, JSON)

## FAQ

**Do I need to convert each Word file manually?**
For a few files, manual conversion with [WordToMD](/#converter) is fastest. For a whole content library, [batch conversion](/blog/batch-convert-word-to-markdown) makes more sense.

**My SSG build fails after importing converted Markdown. What's wrong?**
Check for: (1) missing required frontmatter fields, (2) unescaped special characters in frontmatter values, (3) smart quotes in frontmatter strings (replace with straight quotes).

**Can Word documents become MDX files for React-based SSGs?**
Yes. Convert to standard Markdown first, rename to .mdx, then add React component imports at the top if needed. See the basics in [What Is Markdown](/blog/what-is-markdown-guide).

**Which SSG is best for a team that writes in Word?**
If your team is non-technical and writes in Word, a headless CMS (like Contentful or Sanity) with Markdown support may be a better fit than a file-based SSG. The Word → Markdown workflow works well for developers and hybrid teams.

## Conclusion

Static site generators are an excellent home for content that starts in Word. [WordToMD](/#converter) handles the conversion step; your SSG handles the publishing step. Add frontmatter, organize your files per the SSG's conventions, and you have a content pipeline that scales.